Review: Sigma DP2 Quattro


deutsch_s1

I believe I don’t exaggerate if I say that there is a debate about the new Quattro sensor within the Sigma community. Since Sigma has presented its newest Foveon, there are discussions about the pros and cons of the new unorthodox design.

A part of the sigma users doesn’t like the in relation to the sensor of the Merrill camera lower micro contrast. However others appreciate the realistic colors and the fact that the Quattro sensor can handle motives better in which greater micro contrast is a handicap. As we photographers know, a camera consists of much more than the sensor. For that reason I think it is a great pity that there is a discussion about the sensors instead of about the cameras (DP2Q vs. DP2M).

It is not only the result that counts but rather the way of getting there. Therefore I want to add my own two cents.

Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)

Image-quality

As I wrote in my last posting about the “Foveon-look”, I hold the opinion that there is no single “FOVEON LOOK”. Pre-Merrill DPs, DP Merrills and now the Quattro have all a unique look. But they share an extreme resolving power and a per pixel acuity which outclass Bayer cameras with similar resolution at lower sensitivity.

Therefore there can be no talk of a “bayerisation” of the Foveon.

In comparison to the Merrill – three things have been changed:

All things considered I would say that the Quattro Sensor renders differently, rather than better or worse.

Design, build quality and ergonomics

I’m aware that the design of the Quattro is polarizing. I like it but I understand people who can’t do anything with it.

The differences between the DP2Q and the DP2M are comparable to the differences between Sigma EX and Sigma A/S/C lenses.

The Quattro has a softer (less of a fingerprint magnet) and a more quality look in comparison to the Merrill, but the build quality is on a comparably high level, which is easy to recognize if you compare them side by side.

I have to mention one positive thing about the Quattro’s buttons which are now round with a clearly improved pressure point. Some will disagree but in my opinion that the camera lies better in the hand due to the “reversed” grip.

Handling and Control

The classical handling of the DP hasn’t been changed by much, but there are a few improvements to the very good handling which we already know from the Merrill. I want to list up four improvements which I like very well:

  • The second dial which simplifies tweaking settings in manual mode
  • The new QS menu, which was beatified and which is now easier to personalize/customize
  • Activation of the 100% view on the applied AF point at a push of the button in the middle of the D-pad
  • The very accurate histogram, which shows the effect of exposure compensation much more precisely

Autofocus and write speed

Thanks to the new CPU, write speed has been reduced by half. De facto, this means that the Quattro is twice as fast at writing X3F files to the memory card.

In all aspects the biggest improvement is the AF auxiliary light, which makes the autofocus more reliable at low light, in comparison to the Merrill.

Battery and display

The Quattro has been treated with a new display which appears brighter and sharper with more realistic colors. The new battery, which is called into action, is twice as big but has a minimally lower capacity (DP2Q/1200mAh vs DP2M/1250mAh).

But in practice the Quattro can take twice as many pictures per battery charge despite the display’s higher intensity.

As with the Merrill, Sigma includes two batteries in the package, with which you can take 400 images on average.

Summary

Maybe the Quattro’s look is different, but the image quality is quite similar to the Merrill and on a very high level. Instead of concentrating only on picture quality, Sigma has clearly improved the usability. The camera is faster, handier, and easier to operate, looks more valuable and has a better picture/battery-life ratio.

You can view the following pictures in full resolution on flickr. You only have to click on the pictures, then on the symbol with the arrow and after that on “original”. 🙂
Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution) Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)

You can find more of my DP2Q shots on Pinterest and Flickr.

  1. Martin McDonald January 6, 2015 at 5:13 pm

    Your review makes a lot of sense. How do you find colour on the Quattro? One of the hardest aspects of using the Merrill for me is getting the white balance looking correct. Colours in areas of shadow can look very muddy.

    Reply

    1. Your review makes a lot of sense. How do you find colour on the Quattro? One of the hardest aspects of using the Merrill for me is getting the white balance looking correct. Colours in areas of shadow can look very muddy.

      IMO color rendition of the Quattro is vastly superior to that of the Merrills. WB is mostly either spot on or very close to what I saw with my own eyes and color saturation seems more even across the tonal range. Merrills have a problem with color saturation in the shadows. They appear rather bland, which is supposedly due to the small red and green pixels in the bottom two color layers and the need to apply noise reduction to these layers even when NR is deactivated in SPP. Quattro doesn’t appear to have this problem. Here is my Quattro set on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shirinfoto/sets/72157646362025333/

      I think what you’ll find by looking at the pictures, is that the Quattro has very good color saturation in the shadows. Check these images out:
      Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)
      Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)
      Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)
      Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)
      Sigma DP2 Quattro (volle Auflösung - full resolution)

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: